Definitions for reviews, comments, and other available linked elements, are fuzzy.
We could use a taxonomy of these to think about what to visualize where, and how to summarize all possible connections in a way that feels true to their impact and family of use. And we could use a common style for what goes where (where tools have been built).
cites by author,
linked pubs/projects by readers,
addenda/extensions/self-cites by author,
Extensions and elaborations
Other attached writing and work
notes + Q&A by author,
comments by readers,
pre- and post-‘publication’ (for many of the above)